Academic Freedom or Inclusion? UK Researchers Debate Diversity Criteria in Research Funding

A growing divide is emerging in the UK academic world over proposed changes that would link research funding eligibility to diversity and inclusion (D&I) outcomes.

Nearly 200 senior scholars have signed a letter warning that these changes could threaten academic freedom and the pursuit of research excellence. Under the proposed framework—currently under review by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)—grant applicants may soon be required to demonstrate active diversity and inclusion strategies not only in team composition but also in project design and outcomes. While D&I is already considered in many funding decisions, this proposal aims to embed it more deeply into the funding system.

Some researchers argue that this shift goes too far. They fear that prioritising D&I metrics might lead to tokenism, standardised identity checklists, or the perception that merit-based funding is being replaced by ideological mandates. One anonymous signatory commented: “We risk building a funding culture that values appearance over substance.” For many LGBTQI academics and allies, however, this debate strikes a nerve. The underrepresentation of LGBTQI people in STEM, leadership roles, and funding awards has long been documented. Proponents of inclusive funding policies argue that these measures are about levelling the playing field—not replacing excellence with identity. Dr. Laila Morgan, a research fellow and LGBTQI advocate at a Russell Group university, shared her perspective: “Many of us know what it’s like to be the only queer person in the lab, or to worry about being out during a grant interview. Diversity frameworks don’t silence science—they open it up.” Supporters also highlight that research shaped by diverse perspectives is often better equipped to identify overlooked problems and craft real-world solutions.

In response to these concerns, UKRI released a statement reaffirming its commitment to an inclusive research culture: “Evidence shows that diverse teams foster innovation. We are consulting widely to ensure any future framework supports high-quality research and reflects the diversity of modern Britain.” For LGBTQI researchers, the outcome of this debate is about more than just grant applications—it signals how far the academic system is willing to go to recognise the value of lived experience and inclusive collaboration in shaping the future of knowledge.